Photos from our 82nd annual meeting. It was a great event at our beautiful new Country Club. If you weren’t there, plan on coming next year!. We have great new people in charge of our police and fire. Glendale CA Police Chief Carl Povilaitis, Glendale CA Fire Chief Silvio Lanzas, and Glendale CA PD Lt. Rafael Quintero who is in charge of traffic.
Free invite for Canyon Neighbors!
Our 82nd annual meeting on Wednesday, March 13 at 7:00 pm is a free event for all folks living in the canyon hosted at the new Chevy Chase Country Club. CCEA members dine at the club before the meeting and get 15% off your check.
This year’s meeting will Feature a discussion from Glendale Police explaining how they are dealing with the ongoing problem of reckless drivers who tear up Chevy Chase Drive. Please come and tell them your stories. The problem of speeders and reckless drivers in our canyon needs to be addressed. The cars now so much more powerful, the drivers now seem so much more reckless.
It’s March, that time of year, time to renew your membership or become a new member for $35 and help support the oldest association of homeowners in California. If you live outside the canyon become a Contributing Friend of the CCEA. An easy online payment button is below. Thanks.
Your Business Here! Reach 1500 Canyon Homes!
Have a business you’d like canyon residents to know about? Dog walkers, plumbers, babysitters, lawyers, accountants, gardeners; whatever your business, all you need is a business card, or business card art, to advertise in the Chevy Chase Estates Association annual newsletter and reach over 1500 households in our canyon in our March mailing. For 75 years the CCEA has mailed out our beautiful black and white newsletter to each household in our canyon, and we have decided to open it up to advertising to help cover the costs of mailing and promote our neighborhood businesses. The cost, a mere $50 to let potentially1500 families know about your business or service. Space is limited. This year we are also offering quarter and half page ads! See what last years ads looked like in our newsletter that went out to all 1500+ canyon residents.
Space is limited. Last day for add placements is Jan. 31st. For questions and info, email@example.com.
Please see below for instructions on how to submit your ad.
Ads can be purchased online or via snail-mail.
Purchase your ad space here!
Then email a PDF of your business card to:
Or mail your business card and a check for $50 made out to Chevy Chase Estates Association to:
Chevy Ads c/o Graeme Whifler
3235 Cornwall Drive
Glendale, CA 91206
The Glendale Design Review Board has voted on the 910 Laird project!
Canyon Development Alert! One Step Forward, Two Steps Back.
Once again the project at 910 Laird will be up for review by the Design Review Board this Thursday the 10th of January 2019, 5 PM, at the MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING – 633 E. Broadway, Room 105 And all are welcome!
If you can’t make this hearing please send your thoughts on this project to: firstname.lastname@example.org
FIVE YEARS! Concerned neighbors and the CCEA have been raising objections to a developer’s proposals to build at 910 Laird for the last FIVE years. You can read the brief history here.
The developer is back. It’s claimed to be a redesign again but this time ignoring previous conditions set by the DRB. See the CCEA objection below.
One step forward, two steps back. It appears that in the latest plans under consideration for 910 Laird Drive the applicant has tossed aside the conditions set at the DRB hearing of December 14, 2017. Those conditions were in part:
1. Relocate the garage to a lower elevation on the slope (finish floor level of approximately 770-775′) and with the garage door openings on axis with the driveway extending uphill from Laird Drive.
On the DRB hearing of April 12, 2018, the garage was indeed moved to a lower elevation with the finish floor level of 773′ with the garage door opening on axis with the driveway extending uphill from Laird Drive.
But now it is as if the DRB hearing of December 12, 2017, never happened as once again the driveway has been extended back up behind the neighbors’ upstairs bedroom and the height has increased to 778. It no longer faces Laird. In addition, breaching the neighbors’ privacy and tranquility, upon leaving the garage the driveway will be difficult to navigate requiring one to back down a steep hill and make a sharp turn in reverse.
2. Relocate the house to be lower on the slope in order to reduce its prominence and sense of mass on the hillside. Redesign the project accordingly to address the topography and specific conditions of the new location.
Again at the April 2018 DRB the house had been lowered a little. The family room, kitchen and dining area were lowered 5 feet (790’6″ to 784.00′); the front entry was lowered about 4 feet (785’6″ to 781. 00′); the living room was lowered about 3 feet (785.00′ to 782.00′). The highest elevation point was lowered 8 feet (813.00′ to 805.00′)
The plans submitted now once again void the conditions set forth on December 2017 as the house has been raised 4 ft and pushed up the hill and sited northeast about 10 ft. The house still is about 50% larger than the average home in the neighborhood.
The Planning Commission and the Design Review Board’s repeated admonishments and directions to the Applicant to remedy questionable siting and other mass and scale issues have been met with a spacious, minimally compliant response. This Applicant has never demonstrated a sincere desire to maintain neighborhood compatibility by conforming to the codes that govern hillside projects and should, therefore, be prevented, once again, the opportunity to build a house in the wrong place and in a way that endangers neighbors, violates their privacy and degrades the forested environment of Chevy Chase Canyon.
The Chevy Chase Estates Association has continuously supported the Applicant’s right to develop the property at 910 Laird Drive, but the Applicant has repeatedly demonstrated his disdain for and rejection of the rules and regulations governing the development process. His irresponsible actions have led to a project that again does not conform to the spirit and intent of the Hillside Design Guidelines, leading the CCEA to continue its opposition and to call upon the Design Review Board to again reject the plans as submitted.
Bad Faith, a Picture Tells a Thousand Words.
For many years the DRB has admonished the developer to clean up the sandbags he placed on his lot to mitigate his illegal grading. Several months back the developer met with the concerned neighbors impacted by his plans. He looked them square in their eyes and promised to finally clean up they decaying sandbags within one week. Photos snapped yesterday evidence bad faith.
At 5:00 pm this Thursday, January the 10th, the city’s Design Review Board (DRB) will approve or deny the construction of a new home on Laird Drive. The CCEA and concerned neighbors have repeatedly opposed this project for 5 years because its location behind and above existing homes would eliminate the privacy those homes have enjoyed for many years and would compromise the forested hillside that is part of the Chevy Chase Canyon charm. Another reason this project should be denied is because of the precedent it would set for other developers who are not concerned about preserving the woodland character of the Canyon. They are hoping for an opportunity to build on hillside areas that have historically been off limits. If this project is allowed to move forward, they will get that opportunity.
You can help the effort to preserve the beauty of Chevy Chase Canyon by registering your objection to this project by letting the DRB know your position. The best way is to appear at the hearing and say this project is incompatible with the neighborhood and you request denial of the project. The next best thing is to send an email to the case planner for the project, stating your objection. The more people who express their position, the better the DRB will understand the wishes of the community. Information to communicate your position is below.
Address of the proposed construction: 910 Laird Drive
Case No. : PDR1709694-C (staff report here)
Case Planner: Kathy Duarte
Hearing: Thursday, April the 12th, 5:00 pm – 633 East Broadway, Room 105
Send emails objecting to this project to: email@example.com
If you have questions, send an email to Questions and Comments. You will receive a rapid response.
Is your home here? Can you find your neighbor’s?
New Homes Added This Year!
Click upper right to see full-sized photos.
Homes were photographed at random and some we miss. We also try to find new displays. If your house has been overlooked, perhaps it can be found in the lights of years past below. Enjoy these beautiful canyon treasures, Merry Christmases (Glendale is so cool, we celebrate two, the 25th and the 6th.), Happy Holidays, and a very Happy New Year from your neighbors at the CCEA.
See the wonderful neighborhood years past below.
Click on the photos below to see past Canyon Christmas Light Displays. When the page comes up click on the first photo to see them HUGE on your screen.
BACK BY POPULAR DEMAND – YOUR CANYON HISTORY
The UPDATED History of the Chevy Chase Estates Association and the Community it Serves – SECOND EDITION is once again available for purchase as we’ve printed up a few more. Get yours today for only a $5 donation to cover the cost of printing. A great gift for cherished neighbors, and a great welcome-to-the-neighborhood for new families.
Read about the floods, fires, and secret bridle trails, how from the very beginning the state’s oldest association of homeowners has fought back schemes to make the canyon into a garbage dump, turn the country club into a low-income housing project, or route a freeway straight through the valley. This is a fantastic book lovingly written by a Chevy Chase local. This is the official updated 85-page edition including gorgeous new black and white photos. A must read. A great present that will be cherished for generations. AND IT’S ONLY FIVE BUCKS!
From your 12 neighbors who volunteer to serve on the Chevy Chase Estates Association board of directors as other neighbors have done for 80 years, the CCEA wishes all canyon residents a Happy Thanksgiving.
For some charming and rare older and newer photos if Chevy Chase Canyon on our website, click here. And click on any image to make them a full-sized slide show.
Since it’s founding in 1937, a changing series of 12 elected canyon neighbors have met on the second Wednesday of every month for usually a two-hour meeting to discuss issues of concern to canyon residents and formulate the best ways to address those problems. But 12 that go to Wed. meetings didn’t create, sustain, nor empower the CCEA as a force in the affairs in Glendale. Without the thousands of canyon residents who have signed up for membership in the Chevy Chase Estates Association over the years because they understood our canyon was precious and deserving of protection, without them writing letters or now emails, without them showing up in masse at City Council meetings, without our community of concerned neighbors this canyon could be unrecognizable to us today. Ours is the oldest Association of Homeowners in California. You can read our stellar and singular history here. It’s a history of battles big and small, and a spirited community that always comes together to protect our bit of heaven on earth.
For those of you who follow City Council happenings, you might have seen an extremely disturbing occurrence recently (and for those of you who shun the often-sordid world of politics, it’s time pay attention before it’s too late): Glendale laws which are meant to prevent irresponsible development and “mansionization” in the hillsides are being casually dismissed by the majority of City Council members as mere “suggestions,” despite the pleas of homeowners whose properties and lives are being negatively affected.
As a very short history, in 2011, the then-current City Council adopted the Hillside Design Guidelines (https://www.glendaleca.gov/home/showdocument?id=5155) in response to many years of intense lobbying by CCEA, the Glendale Homeowners Coordinator Council and many other homeowners groups which were opposed to the desecration of our beautiful hillside communities by mansions which were not only completely incompatible with existing neighborhoods (in terms of both size and design style), but also frequently required extensive grading which destroyed the natural beauty of the hillsides and created serious safety hazards for increased flooding and erosion. With gigantic eyesores popping up throughout hillside communities – (an early example was the 3150 El Tovar Drive project in the early 1990s, when the City approved the construction of a house in the range of 2000 square feet, but somehow the developer managed to build an 11,619-square-foot mansion instead) — the public had finally had enough and the City Council finally took action. To put an end to this irresponsible development blighting entire neighborhoods, the Glendale Municipal Code (Zoning Chapter 30.11.040, https://www.glendaleca.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=4915) was revised to provide:
Unbelievably, the majority of the current City Council seems to believe they are somehow exempt from enforcing these Zoning provisions, belittling the Hillside Design Guidelines as mere “suggestions,” not law. (The notable exception is Councilwoman Paula Devine, who has steadfastly tried to uphold the Hillside Design Guidelines, but whose arguments have been minimized and dismissed by fellow City Council members. Councilman Ara Najarian was not present at this meeting.)
Recently, the City Council turned a deaf ear to an appeal from neighbors who objected to a proposed 5,400-square-foot house which would replace the existing 2,792-square-foot home at 1650 Cumberland Terrace. The proposed house is about twice the size of neighboring houses and certainly is not architecturally consistent with the mid-century modern homes which comprise the majority of the neighborhood. Nevertheless, with only four of the five City Council members present, three City Council members approved the project. Councilwoman Paula Devine cast the lone dissenting vote, saying that she agreed with the neighbors that the mass and scale of the project was incompatible with the neighborhood. Councilman Ara Najarian was not in attendance.
It was at that hearing that Mayor Zareh Sinanyan, who voted in favor of the proposal, stated that the design guidelines “are not laws, but suggestions, and therefore open to interpretation and discretion.” (See http://www.latimes.com/socal/glendale-news-press/news/tn-gnp-me-cumberland-mansion-approval-20180831-story.htm for the whole story.)
Does Mayor Sinanyan have a secret copy of the law which is being hidden from the rest of us? According to the Zoning Code, any development “shall be in keeping with” the Hillside Design Guidelines. Does “shall” sound like a “suggestion” to you? Mayor Sinanyan’s statement that the City law is merely a “suggestion” is beyond outrageous. What will we hear next – that it is a “suggestion” that we not steal from the corner store? that it is a “suggestion” that we not cut down protected oak trees? that it is a “suggestion” that we not abandoned cars in the middle of the street in violation of traffic laws? Are those laws, too, merely “suggestions”? And if “shall” does have this new meaning, can we assume it is merely a “suggestion” that we pay our property taxes and utility bills? Fair is fair, after all.
With a few flippant comments, the City Council is destroying years of work which created laws which benefit Glendale residents, not a handful of developers out to make a buck by building the biggest house they can squeeze onto a parcel, regardless of the negative impact to the surrounding community. The City Council needs to be reminded that it is their responsibility, both legally and morally, to enforce ALL the laws; they don’t get to dismiss ones they don’t like, or which might inconvenience their friends or supporters, as mere “suggestions.”
CALL TO ACTION: On Tuesday, 9/18/2018, the City Council will hear the appeal of a Design Review Board (DRB) decision to approve a 9,100-square-foot house to be built on the hillside immediately adjacent to both the Ard Eevin home (which is listed on the National, California and Glendale Registers) and the locally designated Aard Eevin Highlands Historic District. (A letter supporting the appeal is online at https://static1.squarespace.com/static/53a3b9c5e4b0c7212191f67f/t/5b996b9e03ce64cdc84b3bae/1536781215701/ardeevin-historicassessment.pdf.) The Glendale Historical Society is supporting the appellant in this case and this will clearly be an important decision to watch – not only to protect the Highlands district but to protect your neighborhood as well.
If you are concerned about protecting your neighborhood by upholding the rule of law, we strongly urge you to review these recent cases and make your opinions known by emailing the City Council members:
Mayor Zareh Sinanyan firstname.lastname@example.org
Ara Najarian email@example.com
Vartan Gharpetian VGharpetian@GlendaleCA.GOV
Vrej Agajanian firstname.lastname@example.org
Paula Devine email@example.com
PLEASE ENSURE NO ADVERSE IMPACTS TO HISTORIC ARD EEVIN HOME & ARD EEVIN HIGHLANDS HISTORIC DISTRICT
On Tuesday, September 18, City Council will hear the appeal of a decision to approve a 9,100 square-foot house with two garages, to be built on the hillside immediately adjacent to both the Ard Eevin home (listed on the National, California, and Glendale Registers), and the locally designated Ard Eevin Highlands Historic District.
We ask you to attend this meeting in support of the appeal. We want to ensure that:
- Glendale prepares an adequate environmental review of the project to assess potential impacts to the historic buildings that surround it as well as to historic artifacts on the project site.
- A smaller, more compatible project is built in conformity with Glendale Design Guidelines.
In April 2016 the Design Review Board approved the project despite two main problems:
- The City relied on an outdated environmental review document from 2010, when the project was to subdivide one lot into two and build two smaller houses farther from neighboring properties. No analysis of the impacts of the current project on the surrounding historic resources has been prepared.
- The contemporary-style house will dwarf everything around it and is incompatible with the surrounding properties, a range of historic Period Revival and Ranch homes from 1903 – 1955, in terms of size, scale, massing, and architecture.
TGHS is not the appellant in this case; however, we support the appeal. The appellant had an excellent historic resources assessment prepared, which you can access here. The letter in support of the appeal from attorney Amy Minteer is here.
Please note you do not need to speak at Council if you prefer not to. In fact, we encourage members to fill out position cards, which you can use to indicate support of the appeal, but allow TGHS to make the formal case.
Stay tuned. Thank you for your support of historic preservation in Glendale.